mopabites.blogg.se

Metropolitan school district of wayne township v. davila (1992)
Metropolitan school district of wayne township v. davila (1992)










When Sisk arrived in the gym area, he would generally briefly stop by the locker room to obtain any equipment and make *545 sure that the students were basically ready to begin practice. During the 15 minutes between fifth and sixth period, team members were expected to change into appropriate attire in the locker room and be ready to begin practice at the start of sixth period.

metropolitan school district of wayne township v. davila (1992)

Sisk taught a fifth period language arts class, which ended at 1:30 p.m., and he would go to the gym immediately following that class to conduct basketball practice, usually making it to the gym in time for the start of sixth period, which began at 1:45 p.m. Individuals tried out and had been named to the team by Coach/defendant David Sisk during the preceding spring semester.īeginning in the fall semester, practice took place in the afternoon, during the sixth and final period of the day. John and James Doe were both on the basketball team at the start of the 2008-2009 season, along with D.B., J.B., C.S., and C.K., who were in the eighth grade at WMS. The events of this case surround the boys' basketball team at WMS, which is a school sponsored and sanctioned activity that conducts practices on school grounds. The plaintiffs are mothers suing on behalf of their sons, who were in the 7th grade at Waynesboro Middle School (WMS) in Waynesboro, Tennessee, during the 2008-2009 school year. For the reasons discussed herein, the Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted in part and denied in part, and the Motion to Strike will be denied as moot. 79), to which the plaintiffs have responded (Docket No. The defendants have also filed a Motion to Strike (Docket No. 73), and the defendants have filed a reply in support (Docket No. 55), to which the plaintiffs have responded (Docket No.

metropolitan school district of wayne township v. davila (1992)

Pending before the court is the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. John David Schwalb, Williams & Schwalb, Franklin, TN, for Defendants.

metropolitan school district of wayne township v. davila (1992)

Johnson, Johnson Law Firm, PC, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs. Schmidt, III, Law Office of Eddie Schmidt, Nashville, TN, Annette E. Schmidt, III, Hillsboro Village, Edmund J. *544 David Randolph Smith, Law Offices of David Randolph Smith & Edmund J. WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. 2d 542(2011) Shawnee MATHIS, et al., Plaintiffs,












Metropolitan school district of wayne township v. davila (1992)